For the love of the game...
Back toward the beginning of the 2006 season, many were telling me that Art Shell, Tom Walsh, Al Davis, and Freddie Biletnikoff were dinosaurs, advocates of a game which no longer existed. They were right, of course, but not in the way they meant. The game that I witnessed through the rise to my maturity in the 60s, 70s, and early 80s no longer exists. The difference is not better and stronger athletes (although the technology of performance enhancing drugs has improved), nor new, brilliant, and innovative schemes regarding Xs and Os. Rather, the difference is a capitalist's wet dream - money, and lots of it.
Don't misunderstand. The money has brought good and bad things. But to me it has turned the game into something more akin to Madden Football than a strategic and violent competition between men. The earlier era had far more room for players to innovate and to improvise on the football field. It cared more for the afternoon enjoyment of the fan rather than viewing the fan only as marketing potential. The players were in it for the love of the game, not for their 15 minutes of fame or whatever jewelry they could sport to flaunt their newly found wealth. The game cared more for giving the fans their money's worth, rather than holding them up by the ankles to shake out every loose penny. I remember the 1973 playoff game between the Raiders and the Dolphins, when Stabler came to the sideline during the final, winning, two minute drive - not to talk strategy with John Madden, but to tell him, while looking into the Oakland stands, "The fans are getting their money's worth today, aren't they Coach."
It's a good thing that the players now get their financial due. Al Davis fought for this, and for good reason. The fans go to stadiums to see the players, not the uniforms. They are the conduit for the money that comes to the owners, the league, and to the broadcaster, not a mere beneficiary. The players in prior generations knew that the money made during the short span of their career would not sustain them and their families for very long unless they made wise investments, or were able to parlay the notoriety during their playing days into a novelty position in a business selling insurance or automobiles. Too many of our sports heroes wound up penniless in institutions or out living on the street.
But the current wealth has also brought with it a new kind of player. Star players have become CEOs of their own corporations, independent of any motivation to function according to the requirements of the team. From the Raider fan experience, we have the recent examples of Randy Moss and Jerry Porter. One easily senses that Moss' weekly interview program was designed to push his line of clothing and to further his personal fame rather than any thought of promoting or encouraging his teammates. One questions whether he ever thought about team at all. It appears more likely that he viewed teammates, and opposing players alike, as little more than electronic images in his private game of Madden Football. If the images didn't serve to pump up his self image and marketing ability, he felt free to delete and set up in a new Franchise mode. A 2-14 season? No problem. It never existed. Delete, start Franchise, begin again. The Players of the 60s and 70s were faced with spending their careers in a single franchise. A losing season meant redoubling your efforts or going through the heartache all over again.
Working out with the team to get in football shape? It's not a priority for Jerry Porter. Workout privately with a personal trainer to get those pretty ripped abs. So much the better background for a large gold dollar sign suspended from a thick gold rope.
It's interesting to me that Al Davis always had the great reputation of being able to work with difficult players. It is not the above mentioned types where Al had his success. The "difficult" players in the earlier years were not egotistical loners. In those more conservative years, players, like Ted Hendricks, were free spirits who hated to wear neckties. They liked a good joke and didn't want to take life too seriously. Football is, after all, a game, and games are meant to be fun. To them, there was nothing more fun than closely matched competition. In those days, rebellion was wearing white shoes. While other organizations treated football like the military preparing for war, the Raiders loved individuality so long as all that mattered on Sunday afternoon was the team and the victory. The personality of a Raider team was the melting pot of individualism directed at a single goal. The Raiders were, in short, the real "America's team."
In the current climate, coaches no longer set their Xs and Os to represent real players. They are part of the computer program. Many modern coaches question whether they should allow their quarterback to audible at the line. In earlier days, quarterbacks frequently called most of their own plays. They knew the value of team because it opened lines of communications between players who would report to the field general whether they were beating their opponent or getting beat. I remember George Blanda, the man who inspired the name of this website, making adjustments by talking to his teammates in the huddle, and drawing new receiver routs and blocking schemes in the blades of grass, like kids will do in pick up games in the neighborhood.
John Madden gave an interview last year, at about the time he was inducted in the hall, and not long after Art Shell was named the Raiders new head coach. He said that he never wanted to sound like he was stuck in the mud, so during his broadcasting career he always questioned whether players of his era could compete in the modern era. Now he views it differently and, he says, more realistically. He asks, instead, "could any of the modern players have survived in the earlier era?"
But for a few, I think not. Old school would defeat the modern era with intelligence, desire, and the flexibility to adjust on the run. Many argue that Art Shell proved that he and Davis were out of touch with today's game. On the contrary, Art Shell proved that the modern player is out of touch with the love of the game.
Don't misunderstand. The money has brought good and bad things. But to me it has turned the game into something more akin to Madden Football than a strategic and violent competition between men. The earlier era had far more room for players to innovate and to improvise on the football field. It cared more for the afternoon enjoyment of the fan rather than viewing the fan only as marketing potential. The players were in it for the love of the game, not for their 15 minutes of fame or whatever jewelry they could sport to flaunt their newly found wealth. The game cared more for giving the fans their money's worth, rather than holding them up by the ankles to shake out every loose penny. I remember the 1973 playoff game between the Raiders and the Dolphins, when Stabler came to the sideline during the final, winning, two minute drive - not to talk strategy with John Madden, but to tell him, while looking into the Oakland stands, "The fans are getting their money's worth today, aren't they Coach."
It's a good thing that the players now get their financial due. Al Davis fought for this, and for good reason. The fans go to stadiums to see the players, not the uniforms. They are the conduit for the money that comes to the owners, the league, and to the broadcaster, not a mere beneficiary. The players in prior generations knew that the money made during the short span of their career would not sustain them and their families for very long unless they made wise investments, or were able to parlay the notoriety during their playing days into a novelty position in a business selling insurance or automobiles. Too many of our sports heroes wound up penniless in institutions or out living on the street.
But the current wealth has also brought with it a new kind of player. Star players have become CEOs of their own corporations, independent of any motivation to function according to the requirements of the team. From the Raider fan experience, we have the recent examples of Randy Moss and Jerry Porter. One easily senses that Moss' weekly interview program was designed to push his line of clothing and to further his personal fame rather than any thought of promoting or encouraging his teammates. One questions whether he ever thought about team at all. It appears more likely that he viewed teammates, and opposing players alike, as little more than electronic images in his private game of Madden Football. If the images didn't serve to pump up his self image and marketing ability, he felt free to delete and set up in a new Franchise mode. A 2-14 season? No problem. It never existed. Delete, start Franchise, begin again. The Players of the 60s and 70s were faced with spending their careers in a single franchise. A losing season meant redoubling your efforts or going through the heartache all over again.
Working out with the team to get in football shape? It's not a priority for Jerry Porter. Workout privately with a personal trainer to get those pretty ripped abs. So much the better background for a large gold dollar sign suspended from a thick gold rope.
It's interesting to me that Al Davis always had the great reputation of being able to work with difficult players. It is not the above mentioned types where Al had his success. The "difficult" players in the earlier years were not egotistical loners. In those more conservative years, players, like Ted Hendricks, were free spirits who hated to wear neckties. They liked a good joke and didn't want to take life too seriously. Football is, after all, a game, and games are meant to be fun. To them, there was nothing more fun than closely matched competition. In those days, rebellion was wearing white shoes. While other organizations treated football like the military preparing for war, the Raiders loved individuality so long as all that mattered on Sunday afternoon was the team and the victory. The personality of a Raider team was the melting pot of individualism directed at a single goal. The Raiders were, in short, the real "America's team."
In the current climate, coaches no longer set their Xs and Os to represent real players. They are part of the computer program. Many modern coaches question whether they should allow their quarterback to audible at the line. In earlier days, quarterbacks frequently called most of their own plays. They knew the value of team because it opened lines of communications between players who would report to the field general whether they were beating their opponent or getting beat. I remember George Blanda, the man who inspired the name of this website, making adjustments by talking to his teammates in the huddle, and drawing new receiver routs and blocking schemes in the blades of grass, like kids will do in pick up games in the neighborhood.
John Madden gave an interview last year, at about the time he was inducted in the hall, and not long after Art Shell was named the Raiders new head coach. He said that he never wanted to sound like he was stuck in the mud, so during his broadcasting career he always questioned whether players of his era could compete in the modern era. Now he views it differently and, he says, more realistically. He asks, instead, "could any of the modern players have survived in the earlier era?"
But for a few, I think not. Old school would defeat the modern era with intelligence, desire, and the flexibility to adjust on the run. Many argue that Art Shell proved that he and Davis were out of touch with today's game. On the contrary, Art Shell proved that the modern player is out of touch with the love of the game.


8 Comments:
A very thoughtful and interesting post, BladaRocked.
There is no doubt that the modern era has spawned a new breed of player who in some cases are more loyal to the almighty dollar than their original franchise.
The multi billion dollar NFL enterprise has given many players financial security. With the increased dollars, most players are dedicated to their craft all year round. It is capatilism & evolution in its purest form.
However, in the big picture, I would venture to say that most NFL teams' players are comprised of highly skilled & dedicated athletes who love the game. Sure there are malcontents littered across each team who are not on board with the team goals like Moss. The teams that succeed in the modern age share the same commonalities of bygone eras; strong leadership and dedicated athletes striving for team oriented goals.
Another gem.
I'm a bit of a medievalist myself, so it is very easy for me to miss the "old days" of the NFL. My personal bias aside, I truly think you are on to something. Unfortunately this problem is bigger than the NFL. You see the same problem in the NBA & MLB.
Alas, poor Yorick!
Great posts, Guys. And you're right, Calico. Most players give it their all. It's always the few who make us regret losing former times. Those few are enabled by getting fifty million dollar contracts right out of college. Once the money is in the pocket, the genie is out of the bottle.
And, no, the problem isn't merely the NFL. More than the NFL, it's the TV networks. One of these days I'll count through the number of rule changes which are only designed to provide more advertising time to the networks, not to improve the game.
The only real differences between malcontents in the modern era and the previous generation is the size of their bank accounts and the fact that in the information age we are more aware of the "problems".
For the most part, I think that the overall product has improved.
These are a few areas of improvement that I appreciate as a fan;
(1) Wider array of media exposure and increased accessibility to your favorite team; availability of NFL Ticket, NFL Network, Thurs. night games, blogs, internet etc.
(2) Better athletes 1-53 on each roster due to increased sophistication in diet, condtioning, weight training, personal trainers, etc; basically bigger, faster, stronger athletes who work on their profession all year round. I would bet that many special teams players or back-ups on today's teams would be starters on teams 30+ years ago.
The intent of the rule changes has been mainly to protect the players (ie. late hits on QB) or negate unfair advantages in the spirit of competition (ie. stickem, contact on WR past 5 yards).
The overall commercialization of the game is a natural extension of the league improving their bottom line.
Is the game better today than it was 30+ years ago? I would say it is just different with the growth, commercialization, evolution, technology, media etc. The essence of the game remains the same. The core elements of tackling, blocking, running, catching, passing, strategy, coaching remain in tact. The NFL is the best professional sport/league, bar none.
Calico:
What I'm talking about regards rules that were said to be designed to speed the game up, but actually are just used to create more commercial time. How many times have you seen a team in the middle of a two minute drill get an extra time out for a network commercial break? How many times have you been to a game where both teams are standing around on the field because they are waiting for the network to come back from a commercial? In earlier times, the NFL simply demanded that the networks keep up with the game. In the current times, the TV viewer is the more valued customer over the person who spends 80+ plus dollars on a ticket, plus another 30+ for refreshments, plus another 20+ for parking.
You both make an excellent point about the "good apples". For every Moss, Porter, or T.O. there is a Marcus Tuiasosopo. The man has given us everything he has to offer, year after year, for significantly less money, without a single complaint. Even our Walter fell prey to the lesser influences. Although I want Tui to find a home where he can excel, I will miss him when he's gone.
So, slightly off topic, but I can't help celebrating the Kiffer's efforts...
OC: http://www.raiders.com/newsroom/newsroomNewsDetail.jsp?id=30016
OLC: http://www.raiders.com/newsroom/newsroomNewsDetail.jsp?id=30053
DBC: http://www.raiders.com/newsroom/newsroomNewsDetail.jsp?id=30048
AOLC: http://www.raiders.com/newsroom/newsroomNewsDetail.jsp?id=30066
Kiffin his even making hires which control the coaching staff. I think that we can safely say that the power that Davis is giving him is not typical of Al. Al probably gave up the most power to Gruden, but he's giving up more to Kiffin.
Post a Comment
<< Home